Skip to content
Digital Hub

ERP consulting

Work out whether you need an ERP - then which one, and in what order.

ERP is not a reporting upgrade. It is a decision to run finance, inventory and operations on shared definitions. As your ERP consultant we assess readiness and fit, design the target operating model, and phase the architecture. Delivery is a separate discipline, described on our implementation page.

Operations coordinator checking stock on a warehouse floor with a tablet

Conceptual state

Stock counted - ready to invoice

At a glance

Platform focus
Odoo for finance, inventory, procurement and manufacturing; Zoho where operations are lighter and customer-led.
Common triggers
Stock accuracy, job costing, multi-entity reporting, traceability and growth outpacing spreadsheets.
Risk position
Phased scope, real-data UAT and documented cutover - never a single untested switchover.

Scope

What an ERP engagement covers.

Scope is set by the processes that actually constrain you. We phase deliberately rather than implementing every module at once.

  • Operational data model

    Products, variants, units of measure, warehouses, cost methods, projects and cost centres defined once. Almost every reporting dispute later traces back to a decision made here.

  • Order to cash

    Quote, order, fulfilment, delivery and invoice as one traceable chain, so revenue recognition and customer status agree without manual reconciliation.

  • Procure to pay

    Requisitions, purchase orders, receipting, supplier invoice matching and payment approval with clear thresholds and audit trail.

  • Inventory and fulfilment

    Accurate stock positions, replenishment rules, lot or serial traceability where required, and a stocktake process that does not stop the business.

  • Manufacturing and job costing

    Bills of material, routings, work orders and actual versus estimated cost - so quoting improves from real data rather than habit.

  • Finance and reporting

    Chart of accounts, tax treatment for Australian requirements, period close, and management reporting produced from the system rather than rebuilt in spreadsheets.

Readiness

ERP is the right answer less often than vendors suggest.

An honest fit assessment costs a fraction of an abandoned implementation.

ERP is likely right

Signals we look for

  • Stock, job cost or margin figures are argued over monthly
  • Finance rekeys data from operational systems
  • Multiple spreadsheets act as the real system of record
  • Growth is adding admin headcount, not capacity
  • Compliance or traceability needs are outgrowing the tooling

ERP is probably premature

Fix the cheaper thing first

  • The core issue is lead flow or follow-up, not operations
  • Existing accounting plus integration would close the gap
  • Processes are undocumented and still changing weekly
  • No internal owner is available for the project
  • The driver is a single report that could be built directly

What ERP actually is

ERP is not a reporting upgrade. It is a decision to run finance, inventory and operations on shared definitions.

Which is why readiness and target operating model come before platform selection, and why the phasing matters as much as the choice.

Delivery

How we implement.

Each stage produces artefacts you keep: process documentation, data mappings, test evidence and operating procedures.

  1. 01

    Fit assessment

    Current operating model, volumes, integrations and pain points assessed against what an ERP would realistically change. We say so if the answer is not ERP.

  2. 02

    Solution design

    Target processes, data model, module scope, integration points and reporting requirements documented and agreed before configuration begins.

  3. 03

    Configure and build

    Iterative configuration with review checkpoints per process area, plus any integrations to CRM, marketing, logistics or payroll.

  4. 04

    Data migration

    Master data first, then balances and open transactions. Trial runs, reconciliation to source, and a documented cutover with rollback criteria.

  5. 05

    UAT and training

    Real users testing real scenarios against agreed acceptance criteria, then role-based training and written procedures.

  6. 06

    Go-live and stabilise

    An agreed post go-live support window scoped in the engagement, exception tracking, and a prioritised improvement backlog rather than an abandoned project.

Boundaries

An ERP should not try to be everything.

Considering ERP, or recovering from one?

Start with a fit assessment. If your problem is cheaper to solve another way, we will tell you.